Call it the Accra Auto Show and you may not be far from the truth. The various car dealerships in Accra have turned much of the space around Parliament House into some sort of an exhibition centre where they are displaying their four-wheel merchandise to lawmakers. Last Friday, instead of sitting their bums down to do the work they have been elected to do MPs spent a lot of time moving from one dealer to another checking out the latest automobile models. “I want to get a VW Touareg or a Nissan,” one MP said. From his tone and the way he pronounced Nissan (“Nissain”, he said), you can tell he is an MP from the hinterland (not very exposed to the automobiles) and until that day, all he could do was dream of owning a luxurious 4-Wheel-drive. Now, his dream is about to become reality – thanks to government’s decision to approve an auto-loan of 50,000 dollars for each MP. The cash will not be drawn from the national kitty. What is going to happen is that government will guarantee the loans from a couple of banks, which will release the funds directly to the auto dealers after each MP had driven away the luxury sedan or SUV of his choice. Then over a period of four years, the MPs will repay the loans from their salaries. It sounds like a good plan, doesn’t it? But it’s not! We have seen this before. Under John Kufuor, MPs were given a similar facility. In fact, under Kufuor loans were much smaller at just 20,000 dollars. Yet a good number of them failed to pay back, leaving government with the burden of clearing their debts at the expense of the taxpayer. When this happened, President Mills was not helping with the repair works on the international space station. He hadn’t taken a vacation to the moon. Perhaps, he was somewhere receiving medical treatment but he was right here on this planet and he knows about the backlash that greeted Kufuor’s mistake of guaranteeing car loans to MPs. Most Ghanaians saw it as a scheme by our political leaders to fleece the nation. It was the issue of MPs car loans that made most Ghanaians realise politicians have the ability to bury their petty differences to act for their common good. President Mills’ decision to repeat the mistake of guaranteeing auto-loans for MPs (and grant them even more than Kufuor did) will only make sense to those who will benefit from it. Rumour has it that the President didn’t actually want to guarantee the loans but MPs from his own party wrung his hands and forced him to do it. If this is true, it only adds to the perception that the pair between his legs is as soft as dough. If he knows that the right thing to do is not to guarantee the loans, why will he bow to pressure and do what he knows to be wrong? As it was under Kufuor, this decision to guarantee loans for MPs should be condemned because it demonstrates once again that our politicians see themselves as better human beings than the rest of us. When teachers, police officers and civil servants do not get government guaranteed loans, it is unfair (even immoral) for MPs to be given such preferential treatment. We should not fall for the deception that this is just a loan and it will be paid back in due course. Realistically, few MPs can afford to repay this facility from their parliamentary salaries over the four-year period. The average MP earns about 3,000 dollars per month. Interest rates are hovering around 30 percent. By law, people (including MPs) are not allowed to spend more than 40% of their monthly earnings on servicing loans. So do the maths! And this is where the politicians pull a fast one on us. It is inevitable, therefore, that the taxpayer will eventually have to pick up the tab for clearing the MPs’ debts. According to the arrangements being worked out, MPs who fail to repay the loans will have monies deducted from their ex-gratia for the purpose. With the public outrage that greeted the publication of the ex-gratia awards for MPs and Kufuor, a good number of Ghanaians expected President Mills to bring this ex-gratia nonsense to an end. But since ex-gratia is being mentioned as an integral part of the auto-loan deal for MPs, we can assume that nothing has changed. We are going to be forced to dole out hefty sums of money as “gifts” – for that’s what ex-gratia means – for men and women who voluntarily opted to stand for election as MPs, supposedly to serve us. This is not the change Ghanaians voted for, is it? Here, once again, is proof that politics is the easiest road to privilege and wealth in this country. Our politicians are still determined to use their positions to enrich themselves and get all of life’s niceties whiles the rest of us struggle to even get water to drink. This idea of government guaranteeing loans for MPs is sickening. It doesn’t make sense that a government – proclaiming austerity – has taken on the extra financial burden of spending 11.5 million dollars on luxury cars for MPs. It’s a mistake. They are literally taking us for an expensive ride and most of us will not enjoy it. It’s a mistake for which we are going to pay dearly. |
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
MP CAR LOANS: Taking us for a 50,000-dollar ride
After the mouthwash, ‘Triple M’ gets a whitewash!
Muntaka Mubarak Mohammed has been covered – not cleared. Last night, Mr. Mubarak tendered in his resignation as Youth and Sports and President Mills gladly accepted it. That’s ironic considering that he resigned on the same day government issued a statement which suggested that he had been exonerated of allegations that he had made irregular and senseless expense claims. Government’s position is based on the report of a National Security Agency investigation into the allegations. On one hand, the report stridently defends Mr. Mubarak. It even goes to the extent of asserting that a former director at the ministry, Emmanuel Owusu-Ansah, teamed up with Mr. Mubarak’s main accuser “to create problems for the minister”. “Mr. Adim Odoom [the accuser] typed his allegations on Dr. Owusu Ansah’s laptop in Dr. Owusu Ansah’s office,” the government statement says. On the other hand, the report confirms some of the allegations that were made against Mr. Mubarak. For example, he actually made claims for diapers and mouthwash and took more per diem than he was due. He also has in his possession a government vehicle – the one his accuser claimed he had allocated to his wife and he also charged the state for flying his family from Accra to Kumasi. On all of these, the minister’s wrongs are incredibly blamed on his accusers. On the issue of per diem for example, the presidency takes the untenable position that the “amount was authorized by the Chief Director, Mr. Albert Anthony Ampong, but the Minister had no knowledge of what his per diem for the travel was supposed to be.” On Mr. Mubarak’s decision to make the state pay for his family’s air fares from Accra to Kumasi the report states: “The Minister requested for he and his family to travel to Kumasi by air. The Chief Director endorsed the request by the Minister. The request was backed with a memo. The Chief Director did not advise the Minister that his family was not entitled to these tickets.” The government therefore has taken the position that by failing to advise the minister, the chief director engaged in some wrongdoing. This is utter rubbish. In any case, why would government take the minister’s word that he wasn’t advised (or he didn’t know)? What if he was actually advised and he failed to heed wise counsel? The reason is simple. Politicians have a way of covering their own. Government has been so embarrassed by this scandal it needed to make an example of someone. However, making an example of the man who should actually be punished will give fodder to the opposition and that’s the last thing the young administration needs. So they decided to pounce on the whistle blower (the hapless accountant) and the chief director of the ministry. They have been interdicted and the head of the civil service has been instructed to apply “appropriate sanctions against them”. Meanwhile, the (former) minister – who illegally made claims for mouthwash and diapers – walks away with a mere reprimand and an order to refund the monies he forced the government to spend on his girlfriend during a trip to Germany. “The President is dissatisfied with the conduct of the Minister in his decision to embark on the German trip with Ms. Edith Zinayela and in particular in his decision to apply for a visa for her in circumstances that amounted to a mis-description of her official position,” the government statement says. “The decision for the Ministry to pay for Ms. Zinayela’s visa fee was equally improper. It was an error of judgment on the part of the Minister from which it is hoped all other appointees will learn.” I think “mis-description” amounts to fraud and on this score alone, Mr. Mubarak deserves to be punished. He should have been pushed out of office but he has simply been helped to jump off – just to save his face and save the government from further embarrassment, his grave misdeeds watered down to “an error of judgment”. He should also be sanctioned for making those illegal expense claims – whether he knew or not. Last time I checked, innocence was not an excuse. Is it now an excuse under the NDC? So now anyone can take whatever they like and turn around to say that they were not aware of what they could or could not take? Mr. Mubarak unwittingly (and very foolishly) gave the president an opportunity to show us that he (the president) is more serious about dealing with corruption than his predecessor did. That opportunity has been squandered and now public officials have even been given a couple of extra excuses to indulge themselves. With “I didn’t know” and “I wasn’t advised” and they can practically do anything they want. The president has also silenced a good number of those who were getting ready to blow the whistle on corrupt officials by ordering that the (former) minister’s main accuser and the chief director of the ministry should be sanctioned. It is, indeed, “outrageous” – as the presidency says – that the “Chief Director and the Principal Accountant, if they are to be believed, paid out sums of money as large as $10,000 on two separate occasions without any documentation and without any evidence whatsoever.” But this should surprise no one. I am taking the position that Muntaka went to the ministry like a dictator, making demands left, right and centre without listening to anyone. It is possible that the monies were paid to him and he pompously refused to write receipts for them. If I make payment to my boss from the company kitty and he refuses to give me a receipt, what do I do? I either shut the hell up or report to his superior. In this case, the accountant reported the case to the (former) minister’s superior and this is a crime for which he is interdicted, with the sceptre of sanctions looming over his head? The chief director confirms the accountant’s claims that he took monies to be given to the minister. It’s the minister who claims that he took no such monies. Once again, his word against his accusers. Reading the investigative the report, I want to stand behind the accusers. The decision to sanction Mr. Odoom for not taking receipts from the minister sound absurd to me. It’s equally absurd that the president is annoyed with the chief director and the accountant for allowing the minister to make expense claims for monies he spent on mouthwash and diapers. “The Chief Director or the Principal Accountant should have vetted the receipt and exempted items which were not allowable,” the presidency says. “Items like baby oil, baby food and mouth wash should have been disallowed even though they formed a seemingly insignificant part of the bill. The Minister on discovering that this amount had been refunded demanded to withdraw the receipt but the Principal Accountant Mr. Adim Odoom assured him that everything was in order and that he had paid the refund from the imprest which was normal.” If I had been in the (former) minister’s shoes – as stupid as I am – I would have insisted on the right thing being done despite the accountant’s assurances that everything “was in order”. He didn’t do what he knew to be right. For this as well, he should have been punished and not let off the hook in such a manner. So Mr. Mubarak has gotten a white-wash and whistle-blowing in this country has been dealt a terrible blow. Government’s handling of this matter will effectively force a lot prospective whistle-blowers – in the public service, especially – to tuck their whistles in their pockets. You dare not bring that whistle anywhere near your mouth. Otherwise, the dogs of national security will be set loose on you. They will intimidate you and turn around to accuse you of wrongdoing – for failing to advise your boss on what he can or cannot take or do. They will take your boss’ words over yours and leave you to rot under interdiction. If this is “probity and accountability” then I will have none of it! |
MUNTAKA: The cover-up report in full
|
Monday, June 29, 2009
Ayariga: Calls for Muntaka prosecution misplaced
|
Attorney General: Muntaka’s accuser not whistle blower
Mrs Betty Mould, Attorney General and Minister of Justice has dismissed assertions the Principal Accountant at the Sports Ministry, Adim Odoom is a whistle blower.
Story by Nathan Gadugah/myjoyonline.com
Ghana: Mills Interrogates Sports Minister Over Corruption Allegations
Bismark Bebli
4 June 2009
President Mills has interrogated his Minister of Youth and Sports, Alhaji Muntaka Mubarrak over allegations that he airlifted his girl friend, one Edith Zineuali to the finals of the CHAN tournament in Abidjan, which hotel bills were picked up by the state. This was after the President had been informed about the activities of the Minister at the Ministry.
Hon. Muntaka, the National Democratic Congress (NDC) legislator for Asawase in the Ashanti Region is also being accused of allocating a VW Passat vehicle with registration number GT 1351 Z to his wife, contrary to laid down procedures at the Ministry.
This paper gathered that with the avalanche of allegations levelled against him, President John Evans Atta Mills summoned the honourable Minster to the Castle, where he was grilled over a number of hours, to provide answers to the allegations to enable action to be taken by government.
In a report prepared by Mr. Adim Odoom, the Principal Accountant at the Sports Ministry and sent to the President, he catalogued the allegations ranging from per diems that the Minister took, how the Minister single handedly managed issues with regard to the Ministry, how he requested a refund of GH¢5,200 with a receipt in the name of one Zinabu, in respect of meat and other food items purchased from the market, another GH¢674.02 also in respect of baby oil, baby food, mouth wash and other household items.
According to Mr. Odoom, the Minister also allegedly requested for GH¢1000 per match for the services of a Mallam and demanded the cash with immediate effect.
"The Hon. Minister collected $25,000 but released only $13,000 to the GFA for the payment of protocol. The GFA had actually spent $18,000 on the exercise," he said, adding that the Accountant and the Chief Director contacted the Minister but he could not defend his position.
He alleged that since his assumption of office, the Minister took US$2000 as imprest to cater for hotel bills and other expenses at the tournament, but rather made the imprest holder of the Ministry pay all his expenses, and he has refused to acknowledge receipt of the money.
Accordingly, he said, contrary to reports that some individuals sponsored the recent Cote d'Ivoire trip, the Minister had insisted on refund of which US$10,000 was released to him through the Chief Director of the Ministry.
Relevant Links
Apart from Hon. Muntaka taking GH¢2000 per diem for the match between the Blacks Stars and their Beninois counterparts at Kumasi, he requested the accounts office to purchase air return tickets for him, his wife and three children from Accra to Kumasi, and back.
In the last paragraph of the report, Mr. Odoom said, "In an attempt to help the Hon. Minister to run an efficient and effective office, the Accountant had on several occasions advised him on the right things to do. This has aroused the anger of the Hon. Minister and he has subsequently masterminded the transfer of the Accountant, Mr. A. Odoom from his office at the Ministry, an office he had occupied for only three months.'
He also alleged that currently the Minister uses five official vehicles, whilst other departments and senior officers have no vehicles, adding that this has drastically lowered the moral of the staff.
Rashid Pelpuo replaces the corrupt Muntaka
|
Minority stage walk out over Mummuni's vetting
Spio-Garbrah To Replace Mumuni?
If he fails to do so, president Mills will ask him to step aside. Dr. Ekow Spio-Garbrah’s name has been mention as the possible candidate to fill the vacancy.
The Looters Must Go says CDM
Massive Confusion Hits NDC Over Corruption Allegations
The Muntaka Mubarak ‘Khebab saga’ which has become the major topic for discussion in the media lately is likely to cause massive hatred and disaffection among the rank and file of the National Democratic Congress (NDC). DAILY GUIDE can confirm that confusion is looming in the corridors of the ruling party which has umbrella as its symbol, and unless the leadership of the party moves in to halt the untoward trend, something nasty would crop up soon in the NDC. This unpleasant news comes as a result of wild allegations being leveled against top wigs of the party by an aggrieved group of the NDC in the Ashanti region. Christened ‘Ashanti Regional NDC Task Force’, the group alleged that Hon. Muntaka, the embattled Sports Minster and Member of Parliament (MP) for Asawase, suffered his recent quandary due to a plan schemed by some elements in the NDC who wants to bring him down. “The intelligence information we have gathered indicates that there are certain elements in the party who are bent on removing Hon. Muntaka from office.” In a release co-signed by Umar Saeed Usman and Alhaji Safianu, Secretary and Chairman of the group respectively, the group allegedly mentioned Hon. E.T. Mensah, Kojo Bonsu and Ade Coker as those who are trying to pull Hon. Muntaka down. Without providing any evidential proof to support their wild allegations, they appealed to President Mills “to beware of these aforementioned elements who are parading themselves in the corridors of government as King Makers”. The Ashanti Regional NDC Task Force opined that Hon. Muntaka has suffered his fate due to the policies that he implemented at the ministry which were aimed at “making sure that things are put in their proper places and avert people from misusing the public funds”. They contended that the Asawase MP is a very hardworking gentleman with a distinguished character so he could never indulge in any untoward activity that would taint his hard-won reputation and that of his beloved NDC. Still throwing their support behind the Asawase MP, the NDC Task Force depicted Hon. Muntaka as a man of integrity, justice and transparency; describing as hoax, the financial misappropriation leveled against the young politician. The group thanked the government for giving Hon. Muntaka the chance to respond to the charges leveled against him so far, hoping that at the end of the investigations, the Asawase MP would be found clean in the case. Sounding pessimistic, they argued that if care is not taken, factionalism would soon rock the NDC, leading to the party’s inability to retain political power come 2012. From I.F. Joe Awuah Jnr., Kumasi |